A little more than a year ago, my HVAC bit the dust and I replaced it with a new high-efficiency heat pump. I wrote about this extensively in the post, How to heat (and cool) your home: Choosing between Natural Gas and an Electric Heat Pump. In that post, I promised a one-year follow-up, and have spent the past 12 months combing through every utility bill to bring you these insights.
My annual utility bill dropped by 11% after upgrading to a high-efficiency heat pump

In the simplest sense, my annual utility bills went down by 11% ($283.79) between 2024-2025 (with the old system) and 2025-2026 (with the new system). This was pretty close to my projection of 13% when I bought the system, however, that projection assumed that energy prices would remain the same, which, unfortunately, is not the case.
After adjusting for higher energy prices, the savings rate was closer to 18%

Between these two periods, the average price of electricity went up by 4.28%, and the average price of natural gas went up by 13.70% (note inflation was around 4.2% during this period). This helped justify my decision to move from natural gas to electric heat, but brace yourself… Duke Energy is currently seeking to raise electricity rates by 11.6% starting on January 1, 2027.
To strip out the effects of the higher energy prices, I went back and applied the 2025-2026 energy rates to my 2024-2025 utility bills. In this scenario, my “adjusted” utility bill for 2024-2025 would be $2,801.43 (a $210.78, or 8% increase, from the actual total of $2,590.65). By comparing the 2024-2025 “adjusted” utility bill of $2,801.43, to the 2025-2026 actual utility bill of $2,306.86, the new system actually helped save $494.57, or 17.65%!
I wasn’t able to adjust for the different weather between the two years, however, according to memory (and ChatGPT), the 2025-2026 period had colder winters and hotter summers that the previous year. This means that the new system likely had to work harder in the latter period, which downplayed some of the cost savings. We reasonably kept the thermostat at the same temperature across this two-year period, so I assumed that didn’t affect these calculations.
I saved money on both cooling and heating my home, although the biggest savings came from the more efficient cooling

Swapping the air conditioner from a SEER 13 to a SEER 17.5 was a pretty big upgrade. On paper, the new system should reduce energy consumption for cooling the home by 25.7% (1-(13/17.5)). After adjusting for the rate hike in 2025/2026, my calculated savings on cooling between June-Aug. 2024 and the same period in 2025 was 24.41%, so that calculation was pretty spot on. The savings from heating was also significant (12.4%-18.6%).
So the new system will pay for itself in… 28.5 years?
It’s not worth buying a new HVAC system just to lower your utility bills. But if you’re buying a new system anyway (like when mine broke), it’s worth considering a high-efficiency model. It may cost more upfront, but you should be able to get the difference back pretty quickly.
For example, the upfront cost of the high efficiency system was $17,500, whereas I also got a quote for an entry-level system from Sure Comfort for $14,500. So the high efficiency system cost $3,000 more upfront BUT I also got a $2,000 tax credit and $1,400 in rebates from Duke Energy. After accounting for the credits and rebates, the nicer system actually saved me $400, and that’s not even accounting for the energy savings and increased reliability of the nicer system! The federal tax rebate has since expired, but it’s still worth looking into local rebates, and factoring in energy savings over time.
If you’re looking for a heat pump, the two key numbers to look for are the SEER rating (how efficient the air conditioner is) and the Coefficient of Performance, or COP (which measures the efficiency of the heating system). With both numbers, higher is better. I’d recommend looking for an Energy Star rated model, and one that has a “cold climate” designation. Check out last year’s blog for more to get into the weeds on efficiency.
